|
VI. DIGITAL TRANSITION
Critical thought
In current systems of education it is naturally, or
resignedly, accepted that "someone" (from the ministry, the
school board or elsewhere) will think for us, will tell us
what to do and how, when and where we must teach and learn.
We prefer to follow rules imposed from above rather than to
run the risk of being independent. Often teachers claiming
to think otherwise, when standing in front of a classroom
blindly follow unfounded conventions and turn their backs on
the world. However, if teachers do not develop a critical
approach to their own educational actions, including even
the most trivial, it will be hard for them to transmit such
thinking to their pupils.
We recommend the "bell test" to measure the level of
conservatism in a school. We all know that it is not
necessary to ring a bell to end a class. One glance at a
watch is enough. However, observation will show that the
arguments for continuing to use bells are as numerous as
they are false. Many date back to the factory systems of the
previous century. In may places it would be easier to
install a high-tech piece of equipment like a computer than
to abolish a low-tech artifact such as a bell. Here there is
a serious conceptual confusion that reveals a still
primitive state in the process of transition towards the
autonomy of learning. We live subjected to external law,
even in the case of such trivial acts as the ordering of the
school timetable.

|