|
VIII. THE DIGITAL LIBRARY
Reading and writing
In this regard it would not be a bad idea to include a
little more brain in education. Progress in cognitive
neurosciences have determined without question that cerebral
processes during writing differ from those of reading.
Historical evidence has already shown us that a good copier
of manuscripts did not need to know how to read to be able
to copy each linguistic symbol as graphology. From a
neuro-cognitive point of view, medical research has also
confirmed that brain damage causing deterioration in writing
(writing inability or disability) is not always matched by a
similar disability in reading, and vice-versa. Learning to
read is independent from learning to write. Our school
experience teaches us daily that dictation differs from
writing, that faithful copy of a text does not rely on
calligraphy or spelling knowledge, etc. There are also many
ways to learn a text, which have evolved according to the
times and culture. We have thus arrived at the conclusion
that so the so-called learning of reading and writing in a
hybrid product of "bureaucratic reasoning" of school
programs rather than an unequivocal neuro-cognitive fact.
This view is significantly enriched when we move into the
digital world, from text to hypertext.

|